Friday, August 31, 2012
Entropy and Equifinality
I am familiar with the concept of entropy. The authors write, "Living systems tend toward entropy-that is: disorganization, stagnation, and chaos. I was involved in a small group within a church for many years that eventually experienced entropy. We were originally excited and eager to share ideas. We accomplished a lot, including collecting input from the greater parish and writing and implementing a five-year plan for our particular area of the parish’s long-range plan. However, by the seventh year, the group had lost members and was down to the same three people coming to meetings, which were no longer effective and to which I no longer wanted to go. The group had lost its focus of working for the good of the parish and the members were discussing the same things over and over at each meeting. We were definitely stagnating because we had no fresh input, just the same-old, same-old. We were somewhat disorganized; we didn’t always send out agendas prior to the meetings, and we didn’t always use agendas in the actual meetings. There was an event we put on that bordered on chaotic because we assumed it would go on as before so we didn’t put much effort into organizing it. Our group was fully into the state of entropy. Instead of doing what the book suggested to prevent entropy, “increasing inputs of energy and information,” I decided to quit the group. I have no idea how well the group is going now, or even if it still exists.
The authors write, “Equifinality refers to the fact that living systems can take different routes to the same destination. This was apparent to me over the years when I served as a small group leader at a retreat for teens. As an icebreaker, a scavenger hunt was always held the first night pitting small groups against each other. As many years as I was involved, none of my various groups ever used the same strategy and yet my group won more than once. The teens who had been to the retreat before learned that there was more than one way to be successful in a scavenger hunt. So, as the authors also write, “there is more than one way to skin a cat!”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I really liked the examples that you used for both entropy and equifinality. Especially with entropy, your personal experience with it was unique since you were observing the change from order to disorder within a long period of time. It just goes to show that there are so many factors going into keeping stability and focus within a small group. While the author suggested in the chapter to increase the levels of energy and information, sometimes when a group gets to the point of chaos, at that point, the group may not be able to regain what they once had in order to accomplish their end result.
ReplyDeleteHi Lee, great job with your post on entropoty and equifinality. I liked how you quoted their definitions because it gave the reader a good understanding of the term. Your personal experiences with the terms also helped me get a better understanding. I have had similar experiences with small groups and stagnation occurring because of lack of focus or too much energy put in all at once. This caused a burn-out of ideas and motivation for my group. When writing my response to this post, I had to think of the experiences I went through that would be relevant to these terms, and I think you did a good job of that.
ReplyDelete